LVT
Le Van Truong
All Engineering Systems (18)
Research SystemsActive ResearchLab System Dossier
Case Study 09 · 2026 · ML Researcher

GraphCURE

Constrained Expert Routing with Asymmetric NEI Deferral for Evidence-Based Fact Verification

A constrained expert-routing framework for evidence-grounded fact verification that coordinates a direct verdict expert and a complementary expert via Asymmetric Not-Enough-Information (NEI) Deferral, improving validation Macro-F1 from 0.6920 to 0.7112 (+1.92 points, paired-bootstrap P(Δ>0) = 0.9975).

Headline Empirical Metrics
Validation Macro-F1
0.6920 → 0.7112
+1.92 pp improvement via Asymmetric NEI Deferral
Bootstrap Support
P(Δ > 0) = 0.9975
High statistical reliability on validation split
Frozen-Test Δ MF1
+0.00977 / +0.00943
Consistent positive transfer on held-out frozen test sets
02 · Problem Statement

The Technical Bottleneck

In 3-way fact verification (Supported, Refuted, Not Enough Information / NEI), single classifiers suffer from asymmetric boundary confusion between conflicting evidence and insufficient evidence (NEI).

03 · Research Motivation

Why Existing Baselines Fail

Naive ensemble averaging blurs confident Refuted/Supported predictions with uncertain NEI boundaries. Constrained expert routing selectively defers ambiguous boundary instances to a specialized complementary expert.

04 · Proposed Approach

Core Formulation & Insight

Coordinates a primary direct verdict expert with a complementary expert governed by an Asymmetric NEI Deferral policy, evaluated rigorously with paired-bootstrap resampling.

05 · System Architecture & Pipeline Stages

Architectural Design

Two-expert routing architecture with constrained deferral thresholds tailored to the asymmetric structure of the NEI class.

Stage 01

1. Direct Verdict Expert

Produces base probability distributions over Supported, Refuted, and NEI given retrieved evidence.

Stage 02

2. Asymmetric NEI Deferral Gate

Identifies high-uncertainty boundary cases around the NEI decision region and routes them to a complementary expert.

Stage 03

3. Paired-Bootstrap Validation

Quantifies Macro-F1 gains on validation and frozen test splits with 10,000 bootstrap resamples.

06 · Engineering Implementation

Technical Stack & Systems Engineering

Languages
Python
Frameworks & Libraries
PyTorchNumPySciPy Bootstrap Evaluation
Backbone Models
Direct Verdict ExpertComplementary Routing Expert
Compute & Storage Infrastructure
Statistical Paired-Bootstrap Verification

Implementation Highlights

  • →Validated constrained routing improvements using paired-bootstrap probability P(Δ > 0) = 0.9975.
07 · Experimental Setup

Datasets & Protocol

Datasets & Corpora

  • Evidence-Based Fact Verification Validation & Frozen Test Splits

Evaluation Protocol

Evaluated direct expert baseline against constrained Asymmetric NEI Deferral routing.

Tracked Evaluation Metrics

Validation Macro-F1Frozen-Test Macro-F1 ΔPaired-Bootstrap P(Δ > 0)
08 · Quantitative Results & Analysis

Improved validation Macro-F1 from 0.6920 to 0.7112 (+1.92 points, P(Δ>0) = 0.9975) with positive frozen-test gains (+0.00977 / +0.00943 MF1).

Validation Macro-F1
0.6920 → 0.7112

+1.92 pp improvement via Asymmetric NEI Deferral

Bootstrap Support
P(Δ > 0) = 0.9975

High statistical reliability on validation split

Frozen-Test Δ MF1
+0.00977 / +0.00943

Consistent positive transfer on held-out frozen test sets

Empirical Analysis & Interpretation

Selective deferral around the NEI boundary resolves systematic over-prediction without destabilizing high-confidence Supported/Refuted verdicts.

09 · Primary Technical Contributions

What This System Contributes

  • 01Formulated the Asymmetric NEI Deferral routing mechanism and statistical bootstrap evaluation.
10 · Limitations & Scope Constraints

Boundary Conditions & Future Work

  • ·Repository is currently private; metrics are reported from verified research records in the portfolio audit.