LVT
Le Van Truong
All Engineering Systems (18)
Research SystemsCompletedLab System Dossier
Case Study 06 · 2026 · First Author & Lead Researcher

FLeX Biometric Privacy Pipeline

Multi-Level Fingerprint Super-Resolution & Cross-Domain Identity Leakage Evaluation

A large-scale biometric privacy evaluation pipeline testing whether super-resolution (Bicubic, SwinIR, ESRGAN) increases identity leakage from degraded contactless finger-selfies across 71,040 probe images and 2,368 livescan templates on ISPFDv2 (Accepted at FDSE 2026, Springer CCIS).

Headline Empirical Metrics
PSNR / SSIM (Bicubic vs. SwinIR)
25.33 dB / 0.518 vs. 24.70 dB / 0.485
Bicubic outperforms generic SwinIR across PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS
Extracted Minutiae (SwinIR+Enh)
197.50 vs. 51.19 (Raw)
3.86× increase in detected minutiae (421.94 on enhanced clean contactless)
Cross-Domain EER
0.4998 (SwinIR) · 0.5008 (Raw)
No genuine-impostor separation vs. 0.0638 same-domain livescan EER
02 · Problem Statement

The Technical Bottleneck

Smartphone finger-selfies can be captured casually at a distance. A critical security question is whether applying modern image super-resolution to low-resolution finger-selfies reconstructs genuine ridge topology that leaks biometric identity against official livescan databases.

03 · Research Motivation

Why Existing Baselines Fail

Prior image restoration studies stop at PSNR/SSIM or minutiae counts. We hypothesized that enhancement and generic super-resolution can hallucinate ridge-like artifacts that dramatically inflate minutiae counts without actually matching the subject's true livescan fingerprint.

04 · Proposed Approach

Core Formulation & Insight

FLeX links three evaluation tiers in a single reproducible pipeline over 30 synthetic degradation regimes (downscaling, JPEG compression, Gaussian blur, noise): (1) Image fidelity (PSNR, SSIM, AlexNet LPIPS), (2) CLAHE + adaptive Gaussian enhancement + NIST MINDTCT minutiae extraction, and (3) NIST Bozorth3 cross-domain contactless-to-livescan matching (142,080 genuine and impostor comparisons per representation).

05 · System Architecture & Pipeline Stages

Architectural Design

Three-tier biometric evaluation pipeline connecting super-resolution inference, CLAHE ridge enhancement, MINDTCT template generation, and Bozorth3 cross-domain verification.

System Architecture DiagramExtracted from Research Manuscript
FLeX Biometric Privacy Pipeline System Architecture

FLeX three-level leakage evaluation pipeline (FDSE 2026, Springer CCIS).

Stage 01

1. 30-Condition Synthetic Degradation & Super-Resolution

Evaluates 71,040 contactless images across scales s ∈ {32..512}, JPEG q ∈ {25..100}, blur kernels k ∈ {3,5,7}, and noise σ ∈ {5,10,20} reconstructed via Bicubic and SwinIR-M (standardized to 512×512).

Stage 02

2. Ridge Enhancement & NIST MINDTCT Extraction

Applies CLAHE (clip limit 2.0, 8×8 tiles), 3×3 Gaussian smoothing, and adaptive Gaussian thresholding before extracting `.xyt` minutiae templates via MINDTCT.

Stage 03

3. Cross-Domain Bozorth3 Matching & EER Analysis

Matches 71,040 contactless probes against 2,368 livescan gallery templates to compute genuine/impostor distributions, FAR, FRR, ROC curves, and Equal Error Rate (EER).

06 · Engineering Implementation

Technical Stack & Systems Engineering

Languages
PythonBash
Frameworks & Libraries
PyTorchOpenCVLPIPS (AlexNet)NIST NBIS (MINDTCT & Bozorth3)
Backbone Models
SwinIR-M (DIV2K ×2 / ×4)Bicubic InterpolationESRGAN (in extended G2 pipeline)
Compute & Storage Infrastructure
Batch Checkpointing & Manifest PipelineISPFDv2 Cross-Domain Dataset (71,040 Probes + 2,368 Livescan)

Implementation Highlights

  • →Engineered standardized manifest linking, batched GPU inference, and automated NBIS MINDTCT/Bozorth3 wrapper pipelines processing 71,040 probe images.
  • →Verified NBIS discriminability via a same-domain livescan sanity check (genuine mean 101.81 vs. impostor mean 9.29, EER = 0.0638).
07 · Experimental Setup

Datasets & Protocol

Datasets & Corpora

  • ISPFDv2 (35,520 BI + 35,520 RES contactless probes; 2,368 LS livescan gallery images)

Evaluation Protocol

Identical-sample comparison of Raw Contactless, Clean Contactless + Enhancement, Bicubic, and SwinIR + Enhancement across image quality, minutiae count, and cross-domain matching EER.

Tracked Evaluation Metrics

PSNRSSIMLPIPSMean Extracted MinutiaeEqual Error Rate (EER)
08 · Quantitative Results & Analysis

Proved that while SwinIR + enhancement increases extracted minutiae by 3.86× (51.19 → 197.50), cross-domain matching EER remains near random (0.4998), refuting naive minutiae-count leakage assumptions.

PSNR / SSIM (Bicubic vs. SwinIR)
25.33 dB / 0.518 vs. 24.70 dB / 0.485

Bicubic outperforms generic SwinIR across PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS

Extracted Minutiae (SwinIR+Enh)
197.50 vs. 51.19 (Raw)

3.86× increase in detected minutiae (421.94 on enhanced clean contactless)

Cross-Domain EER
0.4998 (SwinIR) · 0.5008 (Raw)

No genuine-impostor separation vs. 0.0638 same-domain livescan EER

Empirical Analysis & Interpretation

Visual restoration quality and minutiae abundance are insufficient proxies for biometric privacy leakage; downstream identity-consistent matching is mandatory.

Visual and magnified ridge comparison across Clean, Degraded LR, Bicubic, and SwinIR outputs.

Visual and magnified ridge comparison across Clean, Degraded LR, Bicubic, and SwinIR outputs.

ROC curves for contactless-to-livescan matching confirming near-random EER ≈ 0.5.

ROC curves for contactless-to-livescan matching confirming near-random EER ≈ 0.5.

09 · Primary Technical Contributions

What This System Contributes

  • 01First author: designed the three-level leakage protocol, implemented the evaluation pipeline, analyzed the 71,040-image results, and authored the FDSE 2026 paper.
10 · Limitations & Scope Constraints

Boundary Conditions & Future Work

  • ·Evaluates generic SwinIR and classical NBIS matching; extended G2 pipeline runs (~497K images with ESRGAN) are tracked in the private research repository.
11 · Associated Peer-Reviewed Manuscript
FDSE 2026 · Springer CCIS · Accepted

FLeX: Fingerprint Leakage Evaluation across Super-Resolution and Cross-Domain Matching

Van-Truong Le, Le-Khanh Nguyen, Tran-Chau Vo Han, Hieu-Hoc Tran Minh, Minh-Triet Tran